miller, sources, responsibilities

Larisa writes (out loud!), about the corporate conservative media in general and Judith Miller in particular.

I know,… I know… I said I wasn’t going to be making the Huffington Post a regular read, but this first sentence from Larisa Alexandrovna just sucked me right in:

Pardon me while I intrude on the whorish theater of martyrdom now assigned to the likes of Judith Miller.

Larisa writes (out loud!), about the corporate conservative media in general and Judith Miller in particular.

Protecting sources is not the same thing as protecting criminals working against the public interest. Or is the public interest no longer part of the equation either?

(Quotes Via The Huffington Post.)

It has become obvious that the CCM has shirked it’s responsibilities to the public and I’ll probably record my thoughts on this at a later date, but go read the article, including the links. You won’t be sorry.

One thought on “miller, sources, responsibilities”

  1. Capital YES! Excellent article. If Congress does pass a law protecting journalists – it will come back on them eventually, but Rove will be safe from hanging for high treason for now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *